Sunday, March 29, 2020

Why Medicare for All Makes Sense

     I believe in Medicare for All so firmly that I wanted to elaborate to (hopefully) make it obvious why Medicare for All is a yuge policy you should get behind (notice I haven't said jack about Bernie Sanders - I definitely back him for president, but I also find it strange the fandom that surrounds politicians. I don't want to treat the man with the same devotion of Trump supporters). Anyways, let's start off by laying out a few points:
  • It'd cost us anywhere from $30-40 TRILLION over the next decade
    • From this column: "The federal government estimates that national healthcare spending will total about $48 trillion over the next 10 years as costs keep going up."As in, we were planning on spending $48 trillion already - so really, the estimates of $30-40 trillion represent a steep discount.
  • We'd be paying for others' health insurance under a Medicare for All system.
    • Do you have friends? Sometimes you chip in a bit extra to be more inclusive and it is what it is.
  • Immigrants without legal status would benefit 
    • Do you have basic empathy? This is honestly the health care version of the "leave a penny" tray at 7-11 or another convenience stores. Don't be a selfish prick.

     Aside from that, there's this theoretical aspect of Medicare for All that just makes sense. As currently structured, everyone who urgently needs it gets medical care - at the emergency room. We're talking heart attacks, strokes, severe wounds, etc. etc. Are these procedures more or less expensive than regular visits to the doctors/preventive care? DEFINITELY more expensive (an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure, the emergency room being the pound of cure).
     So let's compare this to eating out in a group where everyone has agreed to split the check evenly. Social etiquette dictates you order something "reasonable" - you don't wanna be the asshole that ordered surf and turf while the neighbors to your left and right got spaghetti with meatballs and grilled chicken over rice, respectively. If you DON'T want to pay for your neighbors' meals (emergency room care), then don't eat with them. If that's the case, you have to be willing to admit that people can (and should) die for being poor. If you think there's some middle ground on this - there is not. Either people get emergency medical care or they don't. There are no half measures when someone is on the brink of death - doctors try to save lives, or they don't.
     If doctors are bound to save lives, then what that means is you don't get to choose not to eat with your neighbors. Society has already dictated that we take care of each other at that level. So what follows? Well, Medicare for All mandates that everyone gets preventive care, so we aren't collectively on the hook for so many of these ultra-expensive, life-saving procedures. So if you aren't with it already, get with the fucking program. The numbers work out. You can feel good about yourself by knowing you are taking care of your neighbor ... WHILE saving money!! AND you can appreciate the fact that your neighbor got you as well!

Monday, December 23, 2019

Why Donald Trump?

     I think the scary thing about the upcoming presidential elections is how unclear it is to many people. I think it's reasonable, considering the stereotype that most (all?) politicians do the damnedest thing: make promises they don't (or can't?) keep. The strangest thing is when a politician comes up for re-election. You would think the performance evaluation is easy: did they do what they said they were going to? If not, are they making progress I am happy with? Lastly - who could I replace them with?
     With regards to the president, I was told he was going to lock Hillary up. Well... that hasn't happened. I was also under the impression that he was going to build a wall and have Mexico pay for it. Still waiting on that as well...
     I don't want to be such a Debbie Downer, so let's look at some of those good things that have happened in the past few years. The unemployment rate is super low and the economy is crushing it. I feel like, but am not sure, that this is "just some line." As in, something that people say because it's true and everyone is supposed to think it is a good thing. As someone who thinks that there are many jobs that only exist because they are (currently) cheaper than automation, though, the unemployment rate doesn't really mean much to me. In 2019 I think it's a damn shame that, for example, cashiers, servers, and janitors are a thing. You're telling me we can't, in order, craft our orders, pick up our food, and pick up after ourselves? I'm not denying reality - I know people (especially when we get in big groups) are just... messy. We aren't very good at picking up after ourselves. And if you've ever needed any proof... just survey the scene after any concert, festival, or large group event. It's basically always a disgusting mess. So I'm not going to treat the fact that everyone has a job like it's some momentous achievement. The number of people that have jobs is, to me, a dumbass way to measure a country. Why isn't it assumed that everyone should have a job? It's like counting the number of high school graduates. Really? You couldn't get over this extremely low bar constructed by society? Well... bravo (not really).
     As for the economy? Well, it's largely a function of time. As in, progress is inevitable, so whether under one president or another, the economy will (generally) go up. Let's say you disagree and that the president holds quite a bit of sway over the economy. I will concede that point. My follow up is - who does a booming economy serve? Leveraging the stock market is a distinctly privileged activity. Apparently, ~38 million people in America are poor. Are their investments gaining steam? Also, does it even matter considering any amount invested is bound to be negligible? Let's say one were to sock away $100/month (& considering Market Watch says that 44 percent of Americans have expenses exceeding income, this may be a generous figure). Over the course of 30 years, assuming a 7% annual growth, you'll have a nest egg around $116,000. Which isn't gonna last for very long. So we have this instrument (the economy/stock market) that doesn't serve those who need it the most (the poor) and really just helps those who are ahead (the wealthy) to stay that way (by getting even richer). So...remind me why I should care about "the economy," please?
     This is even before we think about the economy and how much it contributes to the fact that we are laying waste to the environment. There are billions in goods that are made in sweatshops in foreign countries that just end up in landfills - why the hell would we be happy about that? It's a cost against the planet and humanity that the rest of us have to pay without even benefiting from. What on earth??
     The crazy thing is I haven't even mentioned the president himself, in terms of character/behavior. I'm just looking at promises made (and broken) as well as why his "wins" don't even count for much (with me, at least). So for those who love the man and ask others to pray for him and CONSTANTLY FEEL THE NEED to connect him to President Obama (who I literally have not mentioned until now and am DEFINITELY not a fan of his policies) - my only question is: why?



Thursday, December 19, 2019

Backwards Planning Society

     One of the ways teachers figure out what and/or how to teach is called backward planning or backward design. The gist is to set a goal first - graph quadratic functions, explain 3 or more causes that led to the fall of Rome, you get the gist. That way, you can structure the lesson more intentionally (by leaving out details that might be considered minor or making a checklist of the things you need to include). I used to adhere to this practice a lot more than I currently do (shoutout to my former roommates for being willing to get together to figure out a curriculum on the weekends), but I still recognize its importance and practical use outside of teaching. In today's case, I will lay out my vision for American society. After all, if change is inevitable, don't we owe it to democracy to choose the future we want to build? (Yes - the answer is definitely yes)
     I don't intend for this post to be political - I think too many folks identify too strongly with one party or the other, so I just plan on writing out ideas. If you can't get behind the ideas, you may be some or all of these:
  1. Too cynical/pessimistic
  2. Uninformed or misinformed
  3. Not very imaginative
     With those in hand, here are some things I envision for The Greatest Country in the World and why I believe in them: 
  • Everyone gets to see the doctor when they need to
    •  Need doesn't mean the ER - I'd much rather we offer health services at the preventive stage because an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure (which, in theory, might reduce healthcare expenditures by 93.75% [16 oz = 1lb so 1/16 is 6.25%], lol)
  •  Reduce the work week to 30 hours/week
    • The 40-hour work week has been in place since 1940. You mean to tell me after damn near 80 years of technological improvements we haven't improved efficiency by 25%? We definitely have, but the labor movement hasn't caught up to taking advantage of that improved efficiency by calling for less hours.
  •  Those who don't work (for whatever reason) should still be entitled to: basic lodging and sustenance 
    • No one likes a freeloader, but y'know what? I'd rather society churn out a small number of freeloaders (and take care of those who can't work) than to turn the misguided, desperate, or just plain bored into criminals (because newsflash: that's what's happening!!).
    • Basic lodging can be defined as high density housing with communal spaces (think dorm accommodations with double/triple occupancy per room, several rooms per hall, and shared common spaces)
  • The IRS is fully funded and offers better service (as in, actually telling us how much we owe instead of making us pay to figure it out. How tf that makes sense to anybody is honestly beyond me)
    •  How the hell can we (the royal we) pay for things if we: 
      • 1) have to PAY someone else just to find out how much we owe, 
      • 2) don't go after cases of tax fraud, and 
      • 3) don't sufficiently inform the populace
  • The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is fully funded 
    • How the hell can we protect ourselves against financial shenanigans? Most of us don't have the resources to pursue any type of legal protection on an individual basis. The solution? We pool resources to create an entity (with teeth) that clamps down on shady financial practices 
      • Essentially, this would be a transparent version of the Better Business Bureau that has the ability to (meaningfully) punish
  • The military isn't overfunded
    • It's 2019 and the Military Industrial Complex is a thing. It's an engine of death, profiteering, and environmental collapse. I believe in funding the military - I just think our view has been skewed by decades of overspending and fearmongering. I relate it to being morbidly obese for a few decades - just because you got used to it doesn't make it healthy.
  • Profits for certain industries are capped (potentially even eliminated?)
    • Take insurance, for example. The idea behind an insurance company is simple: everyone has accidents, and it would suck for dumb luck to ruin your life. The solution? Well if everyone pools their money together, they can look out for each other and mitigate that. Sounds simple and benign enough: a communal pot that prevents financial ruin for any one member of society. The issue? Well, when you scale up to have millions of customers, this simple plan requires administrators and other paper pushers - inspectors, adjusters, etc. etc. So not only do you need enough money to cover all the accidents, but then you gotta account for funding all the people required to make the thing go - that's fine, they're doing work for the group at large, they should make enough to get by, right? Well... I would argue $40 million across 5 people is a tad overboard. I mean, I view companies the same way I view machines - if you build it well, it sustains itself (or at least endures for a long time). You're asking me to believe that these big wigs are providing $40 million+ in value (because it doesn't make sense to pay someone more than they are worth) and that no one else could run it for cheaper. Which, I hate to say, I just don't believe ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ . This is where you can chime in and enlighten me on the value of executives, I guess.

      These ideas are just part of my vision for American society. I underestimated just how much I had to say, but I definitely put out some ideas I think are really important - I've got plenty more, I'll just add them in another post. In any case, I know I might come across as entirely too optimistic, but I'd like to challenge that - could you at least entertain the notion that things in the country are in desperate need of revamping/advancing?

Tuesday, November 19, 2019

(Academic) Responsibility of Immigrants' Children

     I started writing this 6 months ago like this:

     "I had a meeting with a student & her mom today (May 6, 2019) and want to write about it while the meeting's fresh in my head. The part that sticks out to me is near the end of our meeting, when the mom asks why her daughter is bad at math. She goes on to add that she has paid for Kumon from 2nd-8th grade, and now is paying for a tutor at $30/hr for a couple hours a week.
    
     It got me thinking"
... and then I never finished writing :(.

     Anyway, what's driving me to come back to this topic is a meeting I had with someone's dad yesterday (Nov 18, '19). He came in maybe 20-30 minutes after school and asked why his son was doing so poorly. His POV can be summed up as: where I come from, teens are either working full-time or working on top of getting their education. My kid just has to focus on school - I cook for him, I make sure he has nice things - so why isn't he doing well?
     In hindsight, I guess I could have posited that there's a line between spoiling and providing for a child, but at the time, I just felt one part awkward and four parts terrible. Here's the stereotypical immigrant parent - left their home country for a better life, working hard at a (likely crummy) job for their kid to have better opportunities. & he came, in part, griping about how easy his kid has it. A kid who, at least on the surface, doesn't appreciate the sacrifice (at least, not enough to tangibly do anything about it).
     So my deal is...what is the responsibility of the kid in this situation? Nobody asks to be born, and we certainly don't get our choice of parents. But is it too much to ask of a kid to respect the sacrifice of their parents and ...get a high school diploma, maybe a degree? Especially when, at the end of the day, those things benefit the child more than they benefit the parents.
     Obviously I feel some type of way about it, considering my siblings and I all got degrees. Am I speaking from a place of privilege? I don't think so... how much privilege did we have, compared to our fellow children of immigrants? A stable home situation, sure, but plenty of (failing) kids have that. Our parents didn't have the cultural/institutional knowledge to help much when it came to college. Definitely no or not much extra money to speak of. So what's the deal...?
     I don't want to come off as morally superior or anything like that - I'll be the first to tell you my work ethic is sketchy. At the end of the day, though, I still took care of business in school. & the weird thing is - while I definitely remember my parents reminding me of things I grew up with here that they didn't have - I don't actually remember thinking "I need to succeed to make my parents proud," or "My parents didn't leave Vietnam just so I could be a screw-up," or anything like that. In fact, I feel incredibly selfish when I think about my higher education and even my profession - I didn't keep my parents in mind when I picked what I wanted to study or what I wanted to do. I just thought of myself - the major I found interesting, the grades I considered acceptable, and the job I wanted to do for the rest of my life.
     After the conversation we shared, I felt a sense of profound empathy for the dad. Not as a parent that ever had to sacrifice (obviously), but as a son that saw his own dad in this conversation. & for my student, I just felt conflicted, mostly. I don't want to be accusatory, but I do wonder what the deal is with kids when they don't hold up their end of the deal, as it were. I also find it hard to relate - I might be lazy, but I've always achieved according to the standards I've had for myself. It just makes me wonder... how the heck could these kids have such low standards for themselves?
     So, what's this all come down to? Is it on parents for not being harder on their kids? When do kids reach the point where they own their educational experience? How many years will it take before I craft a satisfying answer to this question?? How responsible am I in getting kids to see the sacrifices their parents make?!? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Thursday, August 1, 2019

Perception vs. Reality part 3 (servers)

     & finally, the last occupation I wanted to write about - servers. I feel like they garner a lot of sympathy, and it's not necessarily unwarranted. How could they not, when the federal government only mandates that tipped employees make $2.13/hour? For the scope of this post, though, I'll keep things local.
     So, in our great big state, the minimum wage for servers is not lower. That is, whatever everybody else's minimum wage is, that's what servers get (at the bottom end). So - throughout California, servers must be paid at least $12/hour. In San Jose, Milpitas, & Santa Clara? That jumps to a sweet $15. So we're talking a base salary of $30k/year ($15/hr x 40 hours/week x 50 weeks/year). This is where things get fuzzy, so I welcome input so I can modify this post with more accurate numbers.
     Despite my best Googling efforts, I couldn't find how much an average meal in the Bay Area costs. So, I'll spitball and you'll just bear with me (go ahead and call me out if anything seems wildly off). Considering an average party of 4 (I rounded up from 3.7 and also have no clue how outdated that source is), let's do a brief rundown:
  • An entree per person at... $15/each, sounds about right for casual eateries (probably a typical spot that's 2 $$ on Yelp). That's $60.
  • A shared app for $12 puts us at $72.
  • & let's say just half the group grabs a beer or drink for another... $18, to make the numbers easy. We are looking at a tab of $90.
  • After tax (9.25% in San Jose), that's $98.33.
     Now, how much do people tip? According to Zagat, the national average is 18.1%. I'm trying to keep figures local, but this data isn't specific enough (not really sure why they include coffee shops). So let's just go with 18%. On a bill of $98.33, that works out to $17.70. Let's take some other considerations into account:
  • I usually allot an hour for a meal from the time I sit down to the time I leave. Hour and a half isn't unheard of but definitely longer than my usual experience.
  • Servers usually serve multiple parties at a time.
     At the lower end, assuming a server only works one table per hour (which sounds like an impossibly conservative [low] number), that's a $15 base rate + $17.70, or $32.70 per hour. At 40 hours a week and 50 weeks a year, that works out to .............. $65,400. Which, honestly, is way more than I expected.
     Let me bring up a few counters:
  • A party can take longer than an hour
  • Restaurants experience downtime
     To which I say:
  • There's a reason I use averages
  • I only assumed one table per server per hour
      So... yeah. Obviously those are just a couple numbers I hacked together, so there's plenty of wiggle room. But just going off of ballpark figures, it's hard to say servers are having a tough time, at least in CA. & yeah, not all servers are full-time, but guess what? That just sounds like the same issue with teachers. They might not work year-round, but when they do, the pay ain't bad.
     To wrap up the series - I do NOT hate on any of the particular occupations I wrote on. I just feel they get an unwarranted amount of sympathy from society at large. I DO support raising minimum wage (I am a firm believer that a rising tide lifts all boats), and that coincides with my belief that everyone in America should get paid more (so I am also a fan of a "Freedom Dividend," as championed by Andrew Yang).


Wednesday, July 31, 2019

Bible Quotes to Inform Christian Politics

     I came across this collection of bible quotes that I thought could really inform Christian voters on the ways they should be voting (if they're concerned about those corny things like, y'know, loving your neighbor and eternal life in heaven, or whatever). These quotes are pertinent for me because there are times my dad will defend policies that I find absolutely abhorrent. When I ask him if he is being a good Catholic, he says something along the lines of separating religion and politics. To which I say... if you can't walk the walk (live out the teachings of the Bible), then don't talk the talk (preach). In any case, here you go:

Leviticus 25:35 If any of your people become poor and unable to support themselves among you, help them as you would a foreigner or stranger, so they may continue to live among you.
Proverbs 11:24 One gives freely, yet grows all the richer; another withholds what he should give, and only suffers want.
Proverbs 13:11 Dishonest money dwindles away, but whoever gathers money little by little makes it grow.
Proverbs 15:27 Whoever is greedy for unjust gain troubles his own household, but he who hates bribes will live.
Proverbs 17:5 He who mocks the poor taunts his Maker; He who rejoices at misfortune will not go unpunished
Proverbs 22:22-23 Do not exploit the poor because they are poor, or crush the needy in court, for the Lord will plead their case, and exact life for life.
Proverbs 22:16 Whoever oppresses the poor for his own gain and whoever gives to the rich, both come to poverty.
Proverbs 22:26–27 Do not be one of those who shakes hands in a pledge, one of those who is surety for debts; if you have nothing with which to pay, why should he take away your bed from under you?
Proverbs 28:25-28 A greedy man stirs up strife, but the one who trusts in the Lord will be enriched. Whoever trusts in his own mind is a fool, but he who walks in wisdom will be delivered. Whoever gives to the poor will not want, but he who hides his eyes will get many a curse.
Proverbs 29:7 A righteous man knows the rights of the poor; a wicked man does not understand such knowledge.
Psalm 62:10 Put no trust in extortion; set no vain hopes on robbery; if riches increase, set not your heart on them.
Psalm 82:3-4 Give justice to the weak and the fatherless; maintain the right of the poor and afflicted. Rescue the weak and the needy; deliver them from the hand of the wicked.
Isaiah 1:17 Learn to do good; seek justice, fight oppression; bring justice to the fatherless, plead the widow's cause.
Isaiah 10:1-2 Woe to those who make unjust laws, to those who issue oppressive decrees, to deprive the poor of their rights and withhold justice from the oppressed of my people, making widows their prey and robbing the fatherless.
Isaiah 56:11 The dogs have a mighty appetite; they never have enough. But they are shepherds who have no understanding; they have all turned to their own way, each to his own gain, one and all.
Isaiah 58: 6-7 Is this not a better fast, to loose the chains of injustice and untie the burden, to free the oppressed and break every yoke? Or to share your food with the hungry and to provide the poor wanderer with shelter—to clothe the naked, and not to turn your eyes away from your brother?
Isaiah 58:10 If you break the yoke of oppression, end the finger-pointing and malicious talk, and work to feed the hungry and fight for the oppressed, your light will rise in the darkness; your night will be like the midday sun.
Ezekiel 16:49 Now this was the sin of your sister Sodom: She and her daughters were arrogant, overfed and apathetic; they did not help the poor and needy.
Ecclesiastes 5:10-14 Whoever loves money never has enough; whoever loves wealth is never satisfied with their income. This too is meaningless. As riches increase, so do those who covet them. Of what benefit are they to the owners except to feast their eyes on them?
Zechariah 7:9-11 This is what the Lord Almighty said: ‘Administer true justice; show mercy and compassion to one another. Do not oppress the widow or the fatherless, the foreigner or the poor. Do not plot evil against each other.’
Jeremiah 22:3 Thus says the Lord: Do justice and righteousness, and deliver from the hand of the oppressor him who has been robbed. Do no wrong or violence to the resident alien, the fatherless, and the widow, nor shed innocent blood here.
Jeremiah 22:13 Woe to him who builds his house without righteousness, and his upper rooms without justice, who makes his neighbor work for nothing and refuses to pay his wages.
Malachi 3:5-6 "I will be quick to denounce sorcerers, adulterers, and perjurers, and those who defraud laborers of their wages, who oppress the widows and the fatherless, and deprive the foreigners among you of justice, but do not fear me,” says the Lord Almighty.
Amos 2: 6-7 “For three sins of Israel, even for four, I will not relent. They sell the innocent for silver, and the needy for a pair of sandals. They trample on the heads of the poor as on the dust of the ground and deny justice to the oppressed.”
Matthew 5:42 “Give to him who asks you, and from him who wants to borrow from you do not turn away.”
Matthew 6:24 “No one can serve two masters, for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and money.”
Matthew 13:22 “As for what was sown among thorns, this is the one who hears the word, but the cares of the world and the lure of riches choke the word, and it yields nothing.”
Matthew 19:21 “If you want to be perfect, go and sell your belongings and give the money to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven.”
Mark 8:36 “What good is it for a man to gain the whole world, yet forfeit his soul?”
Luke 3:11 “Anyone who has two shirts should share with the one who has none, and anyone who has food should do the same.”
Luke 4:18 “The Spirit of the Lord is on me, because he has chosen me to bring good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the prisoners and restore sight for the blind, to set the oppressed free, to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor.”
Luke 12:15 Then he said to them, “Watch out! Be on your guard against all kinds of greed; a man's life does not consist in the abundance of his possessions.”
Luke 12:48 “To whom much is given, much will be expected; and from whom much has been entrusted, much more will be asked.”
Acts 8:20 May your money perish with you, because you thought you could buy the gift of God with money!
Acts 20:35 “In all I did, I showed you that by this kind of hard work we must help the weak, remembering the words of Lord Jesus himself: ‘It is more blessed to give than to receive.’”
1 Timothy 6:17-19 Command those who are currently rich not to be arrogant nor to put their hope in wealth, which is fleeting, but in God, who richly provides for us. Command them to do good, to be rich in good deeds, to be generous and willing to share. In this way they will save up treasure for the coming age, so that they may have life that is truly life.
1 Timothy 6:9 But those who desire wealth fall into temptation, into a snare, into many senseless and harmful desires that plunge people into ruin and destruction.
Philippians 2:3-4 Do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain conceit. Rather, value others above yourself in humility, looking out not for just yourselves, but each of you for the good of others.
2 Corinthians 8:13-15 Our desire is not that others might be relieved while you work hard, but that there might be equality. At this time your plenty will supply what they need, so that in turn their plenty will supply what you need. The goal is equality, as it is written: “The one who gathered much did not have too much, and the one who gathered little did not have too little.”
James 2:14-17 What good is it, my brothers and sisters, if someone claims to have faith but has no deeds? Can such faith save them? Suppose a brother or sister is without clothes and daily food. If one of you says to them, “Go in peace, keep warm and well-fed,” but does nothing about their physical needs, what good is it? In the same way, faith by itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead.
James 5:4-6 Look! The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you. The cries of the harvesters have reached the ears of the Lord Almighty. You have lived on earth in luxury and self-indulgence. You have fattened yourselves in the day of slaughter. You have condemned and murdered the innocent one, who was not opposing you.
1 John 3:17-18 If anyone has material possessions and sees a brother or sister in need but has no pity on them, how can the love of God be in that person? Dear children, let us not love with words or speech but with actions and in truth.
Matthew 25:42-45 'For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you have me nothing to drink, I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I was sick and in prison you did not look after me.' They also will answer, 'Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?'
He will reply, 'Truly I tell you, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.'
John 13:35 By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.
     To cover some of these in a smaller set of more easily digestible bullet points:
  • Help those who are poor and/or unable to support themselves
  • Do not oppress each other (y'know, like voting against each others' civil rights, or something like that)
  • We should be happier to give than to take (this one's tough for me because I want us to give with autonomy, not for the labor force to give up any/all leverage to employers)
  • Don't be greedy (again, a tough one for me. I don't want people to be greedy, but in a democratic society that also includes checking others' insatiable greed - y'know, like folks pulling in billions a year [hate to say it, but most folks barely have a concept of how much a billion of anything is])
  • There should be equity to the point where those at the top don't have too much (like, say, a megayacht that pollutes the ocean) while those at the bottom don't have too little (I would say lacking adequate healthcare, housing, and food qualify you as having too little)
  • Faith without action is worthless (so NO, running your trap about being a good Christian or person does NOT count for anything!!
     So, there you go. If you wanna be a good Christian, uphold some of these beliefs. There's no 2 ways about it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Monday, July 29, 2019

Perception vs. Reality part 2 (police officers)

     Last I wrote, it was to defend the financial viability of the teaching profession. Do I still think teachers are underpaid? Yes. That's because I think most folks in the labor force are underpaid, though. We can't simultaneously be one of the wealthiest nations on Earth and have the housing crisis that we have without extreme inequality. What's that look like? People not being able to afford housing, families, and daycare, to start. & before you start - I am not even so liberal as to believe that people deserve all of these things as a right (in a better world, I might). However, it is my fundamental belief that people who work full-time should get to do those things, no question. & if you don't agree with that, then I have no issue saying you're part of the problem. That's a whole other post in itself, though, so let me loop back to this entry: the (myth?) of police officers being endangered on a daily or even regular basis.
     First, a few numbers: 30% of American adults have a gun. I'm sure there's quite a bit of regional and racial variance. In Rhode Island, the gun ownership rate is 5.8%. In Alaska, the rate soars to 61.7%. In California, we sit at 19.8%.
     Well, as I continued research, I found a page that was much more informative and relevant. I planned on compiling numbers and putting together some reasonable scenarios, but even that would have been guesswork on my part. Without further ado: the official data for assaults on law enforcement officers in California. I know clicking links is a hassle, so I'll def. run down some numbers from that page. Let's start at a serious bottom line - how many officers do you think were killed in the line of duty in California in 2018? The CA pop is ~39.5 million, and there are about 78,500 sworn officers (as in, that doesn't count civilian staff).

Waiting for a guess.
Waiting for a guess.
Still waiting for a guess.

     That's right, you guessed it - in 2018, a whopping 7 officers were killed in the line of duty. To add to that stat a little more - 3 of those 7 were accidental. 4 deaths of 78500 officers returns a .005% likelihood of death. As a comparison, you are MORE likely to flip heads with a coin 14 times in a row than an officer in California is to die on the job. If that doesn't impress you, you have a poor understanding of probability.
     You might be wondering - well, that's just deaths. Surely officers encounter danger otherwise? Before I talk about those stats - I want to underscore the fact that if you do something and are endangered .005% of the time, it is incredibly safe. You might not like that number because you're used to planes, trains, and other vehicles having a much higher threshold of safety, but in the historical scheme of things? It's incredibly safe to be an officer in California. Now, on to these other stats.
     In 2018, there were 11,148 assaults on officers. Eye-popping number, right? Well, let's pump the brakes. 9175 (82.3%) of those assaults involved hands, fists, and/or feet. So... I'm gonna go ahead and file none or very close to none of those as life-threatening, because you can damn well believe that someone would be riddled with a dozen or more bullets before they managed to kill an officer without a weapon. And please - if you pull up one counterexample where a cop is threatened, you are still ignoring the other 9174 cases. It's just a fundamental misunderstanding of numbers if you think that case matters to my overall argument.
     How about the other 1,973 assaults? 279 (2.5%) of them involved a firearm and 200 (1.8%) of them involved a knife. 1494 (13.4%) of them involved some "other" dangerous weapon. The word "involved" is tricky, because I'm willing to bet these stats are inflated by assaults that don't include the use of said weapon but merely possession. I wish I could have these stats boiled down more simply: # of assaults where officers were stabbed, shot, or bludgeoned. Why? Well, I just wouldn't want the numbers to include instances where cops are bruised or scratched up because... I don't really consider that dangerous. If you do count those instances, you have to admit that you are seriously lowering the bar for officer endangerment. It's also sad because we are at such a low number of "dangerous" incidents that you have to split hairs between what a reasonable person would consider dangerous compared to someone who is pro- or anti-cop (who are vested in inflating or deflating those numbers, respectively).
     So, there you have it. By the numbers, officers in California are not regularly putting their lives on the line. & if you really, for some strange reason are so vested in believing that throwing on a uniform to enforce the law makes you a goddamn hero - I have another number to soothe you. I don't know about the rest of the state, but officers in SJPD are well-compensated. If you don't click the link, it just shows that 19 of the top 20 highest-paid employees of the City of San Jose are all cops - and none of them took home a dime less than $300,000 (in 2017, at least). So you can rest easy knowing that those who patrol our streets are paid quite handsomely.